How We Check Our CISA and CISM Questions

Practice questions with wrong or ambiguous answer keys do real damage: they teach the opposite of the judgment the exam rewards. Here is exactly how every Auditor Path question is checked before it reaches you, and what happens when something slips through.

The bank at a glance

1. Written to ISACA's item-writing rules

Each question follows the rules in ISACA's published item-writing guidance, and automated tests reject any question that breaks them:

2. Blind answer-key review

Every question is answered again by a separate reviewer that never sees our answer key. The reviewer is an AI model briefed on the IS auditor and security manager mindsets and told to flag any question with two defensible answers, no correct answer or an ambiguous stem.

Blind review catches disagreements, not shared blind spots, so it does not replace the report button below.

3. No answer giveaways

Test-wise candidates learn to spot patterns that have nothing to do with the content. Automated tests check the whole bank for the most common one:

4. Plausible wrong answers

Every wrong option is written to be tempting to someone who lacks the experience to choose the key, usually the technically sound action that ignores the auditor's or manager's role. Options that no candidate would choose, such as joke answers, are removed.

5. Report anything that looks wrong

Every question has a Report button. Reports go to a review queue, and a question with a confirmed problem is corrected or retired. Retired questions are removed from practice and mocks automatically.

If you think a key is wrong, report it with your reasoning. We would rather fix a question than defend it.

Related on Auditor Path

Sources

ISACA CISA and CISM exam content outlines; ISACA item development guidance for CISA and CISM.